Cost-Benefit Analysis: 20-Year Health and Financial Implications of Metabolic Syndrome vs. Proactive Wellness in Males

1. Executive Summary

This report presents a comprehensive 20-year cost-benefit analysis comparing two distinct male profiles: one living with metabolic syndrome (specifically high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and diabetes, with a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 30 and 35 kg/m²) and another maintaining a proactive healthy lifestyle (normal BMI, no metabolic syndrome, investing in quality whole foods, gym membership, and personal training). The analysis projects a significant financial burden associated with metabolic syndrome over two decades, primarily driven by escalating healthcare expenditures, including doctor visits, medications, and higher insurance premiums. In contrast, while a healthy lifestyle involves direct investments in food and fitness, these costs are substantially offset by drastically reduced medical expenses over the long term. Beyond the financial implications, metabolic syndrome is consistently linked to a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality, resulting in a notable reduction in life expectancy. The proactive healthy lifestyle, conversely, is associated with lower mortality risks and the preservation of a typical life expectancy, alongside enhanced quality of life. The report concludes that investing in a proactive healthy lifestyle, despite its initial and ongoing direct costs, yields profound long-term benefits. These benefits encompass substantial financial savings, a significantly reduced mortality risk, and a higher quality of life, underscoring the critical economic and human value of preventative health measures.

2. Introduction

Background on Metabolic Syndrome and its Burden

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of interconnected conditions—including high blood pressure, elevated blood sugar, excess abdominal fat, and abnormal cholesterol or triglyceride levels—that collectively increase an individual's risk for serious health issues such as heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes. Its increasing prevalence globally represents a significant challenge to public health systems and national economies. The financial burden associated with metabolic syndrome is substantial; for instance, total costs of medical care are observed to be 20% higher among patients with metabolic syndrome, amounting to $40,873 annually compared to $33,010 for those without the condition.[1] The presence of each additional metabolic syndrome component further augments these annual costs.[1] On a broader scale, diet-related cardiometabolic disease (CMD) costs are estimated at $301 per person annually, translating to a staggering $50.4 billion for the entire population, representing 18.2% of total CMD costs.[2] This highlights a direct connection between an individual's health status and their financial well-being, extending beyond immediate medical bills to broader economic productivity. The systemic economic impact of diet-related chronic conditions underscores that addressing metabolic syndrome through prevention or management has profound economic implications, not merely health-related ones. This establishes the foundation for the cost-benefit analysis, demonstrating that health is a critical component of economic stability.

Purpose of the Report

This report aims to provide a quantitative and qualitative comparison over a 20-year period, detailing the financial expenditures and mortality risks associated with a male living with metabolic syndrome versus a male proactively investing in a healthy lifestyle. The objective is to offer a data-driven perspective on the long-term economic and health "return on investment" of preventative health measures.

Defining the Two Male Scenarios for Analysis

For the purpose of this analysis, two distinct male profiles have been established:

  • Scenario A: The Metabolic Syndrome Male: This profile represents a male with a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 30 and 35 kg/m² (classified as Class 1 or 2 obesity). Crucially, he is diagnosed with metabolic syndrome, specifically encompassing high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and diabetes. This combination of conditions is common and significantly elevates health risks and associated costs.

  • Scenario B: The Healthy Male: This profile represents a male with a normal BMI and no pre-existing metabolic syndrome conditions. He actively engages in a preventative lifestyle, which includes consistently consuming quality whole foods (emphasizing meats, vegetables, and fruits), maintaining a gym membership, and benefiting from two years of professional guidance from a personal trainer (at $3,000 per year).

3. Scenario A: The Metabolic Syndrome Male (BMI 30-35)

Detailed Profile

This individual is characterized by a BMI in the obese range (30-35 kg/m²) and the presence of metabolic syndrome, specifically high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and diabetes. This combination significantly increases the likelihood of developing severe health complications, necessitating extensive medical care, frequent doctor visits, and ongoing prescription medication.

Annual Cost Breakdown

The financial burden for a male living with metabolic syndrome, specifically with obesity (BMI 30-35), high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and diabetes, is substantial.

Table 1: Estimated Annual Costs for Metabolic Syndrome Male

The financial burden of obesity alone is substantial; the average annual medical expenditure for an adult with obesity is approximately double that for an adult with normal weight, with present estimations being $5,477 compared with $2,696 annually.[3] For individuals with multiple obesity-related comorbidities (ORCs), such as those with metabolic syndrome, the costs are "beyond additive." For Class 1 obesity (BMI 30-35) with multimorbidity (≥2 ORCs), the ORC-related total health care costs were 151% higher, approximately $1,082.[3] This indicates a significant increase due to the presence of multiple conditions.

The presence of specific metabolic syndrome components further drives costs. Individuals with diagnosed diabetes incur annual medical expenditures that are 2.6 times higher than what would be expected without diabetes [4], with an average of $19,736 in annual medical expenditures, of which $12,022 is directly attributable to diabetes.[5] For high blood pressure, annual medical costs were $2,759 higher than for people without hypertension in 2019 [6], with an adjusted incremental expenditure of $1,920 annually.[7] Treatment for high cholesterol, often involving statins, can cost between $700 and $2,100 annually for individuals with LDL cholesterol levels ≥130 mg/dl.[8] The incremental cost per patient can range from $590 to $1,920 per year.[8] Considering the individual in Scenario A has high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and diabetes, the "Overall costs" for individuals with ASCVD (Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, which encompasses high cholesterol and high blood pressure) and comorbid diabetes provides a comprehensive figure. These costs were $21,542 in 2019.[9] This figure includes direct medical costs like doctor visits, hospital care, and prescription drugs, as well as out-of-pocket payments and payments by various insurance sources.[9]

Regarding health insurance premiums, the average annual cost of individual health insurance in the US in 2024 is $8,951.[10] However, individuals with obesity and chronic conditions typically face "dramatically higher" health insurance premiums.[12] The proportion of income spent on private insurance premiums is also higher for people with diabetes.[13] Assuming a 25% surcharge due to multiple chronic conditions, the premium would be $8,951 * 1.25 = $11,189 annually.

For average food costs, reflecting a typical American diet, the average cost of groceries in America in 2024 is $418.44 per person per month [14], which translates to $5,021 annually. This cost reflects a typical American diet, which often includes more processed and less healthy options due to affordability.[15] General vitamin and supplement use is also common, with average annual spending estimated at $510.[16]

20-Year Total Cost Projection

Assuming a consistent annual cost over the 20-year period (without accounting for potential inflation or disease progression, which would likely increase costs further), the total estimated 20-year cost for the metabolic syndrome male is $38,262 per year multiplied by 20 years, resulting in $765,240.

The financial burden of multiple chronic conditions is not merely additive; it compounds over time. The literature explicitly notes a "beyond-additive effect of obesity-related multimorbidity on ORC-related total costs".[3] For instance, total costs increased by an average of 24% for each additional metabolic syndrome component.[1] This suggests that simply summing the costs of individual conditions (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia) might underestimate the true financial burden when they co-exist. The 20-year projection, therefore, represents a conservative baseline, as the complexity and severity of conditions, and thus costs, are highly likely to escalate over two decades. This compounding effect means that the financial disparity between the healthy and metabolic syndrome scenarios is likely to widen significantly over time, underscoring the urgent need for early intervention and prevention. The longer an individual lives with these conditions, the greater the exponential increase in associated costs.

Associated Mortality Risk and Life Expectancy Impact

Obese men with metabolic syndrome (MetS) face a significantly elevated risk of all-cause mortality, with a Relative Risk (RR) of 1.55 (95% CI 1.14–2.11) compared to normal weight healthy men.[18] The risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality is even more pronounced, with an RR of 2.83 (95% CI 1.70–4.72).[18]

Moderate obesity (BMI 30-35) is associated with a reduction in life expectancy by approximately three years.[19] Furthermore, type 2 diabetes alone is estimated to reduce life expectancy by up to 10 years.[21] The cumulative impact of multiple metabolic syndrome components (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes) further compounds this reduction, leading to a considerably shortened lifespan.

While some meta-analyses suggest that for BMI in the 30-<35 range, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality might be around 0.97, potentially implying no increased risk or even a slight protective effect [22], it is important to consider the specific conditions of this scenario. These broader meta-analyses acknowledge potential confounding factors such as smoking and prediagnostic disease. In contrast, studies that specifically examine obese men with metabolic syndrome (which is the explicit condition in this scenario) consistently find a clear and significant increase in all-cause and CVD mortality risk.[18] This highlights that the presence of metabolic dysfunction is a more potent predictor of adverse outcomes than BMI in isolation. This understanding is vital for clinical practice and public health messaging, emphasizing that while BMI is a useful screening tool, the underlying metabolic health is the primary driver of disease progression and mortality risk. Therefore, interventions should focus on improving metabolic parameters rather than solely on weight reduction.

4. Scenario B: The Healthy Male (Normal BMI, No Metabolic Syndrome)

Detailed Profile

This individual maintains optimal health markers, characterized by a normal BMI and the absence of metabolic syndrome conditions. Their lifestyle choices are proactive investments in well-being, including a diet rich in whole foods, consistent physical activity through a gym membership, and initial professional guidance from a personal trainer to establish effective exercise habits.

Annual Cost Breakdown

The annual costs for a healthy male are structured to reflect proactive investments in health.

Table 2: Estimated Annual Costs for Healthy Male

The average annual medical expenditure for an adult with normal weight is significantly lower, estimated at $2,696.3 Another study reports $2,368 for a person with a BMI of 19.[23] This figure typically covers routine preventative care, such as annual physicals and minor health concerns, rather than ongoing disease management.

The average annual cost of individual health insurance in the US in 2024 is $8,951.[10] For a healthy individual without chronic conditions, this average is a reasonable estimate, as they would not incur the surcharges typically applied to individuals with pre-existing or chronic health issues.

The user specifies "quality foods (not necessarily organic, but more whole foods such as meats, vegetables and fruits)." A study estimating the annual cost of buying "only healthy groceries" for an individual ranges from $10,268 (Colorado, lowest) to $14,525 (Hawaii, highest).[24] A mid-range estimate of $12,000 annually is used for this analysis. Consistent with Scenario A, the average annual spending on general vitamins or supplements is $510.[16]

Average gym membership costs typically range from $240 to $720 per year.[25] Popular gym chains often fall within the $400-$700 annual range.[25] A mid-range estimate of $500 annually is used. The query explicitly states an investment of $3,000 per year for the first two years for a personal trainer. This is a targeted, upfront investment to establish effective exercise routines and motivation. After the initial two years, this cost is assumed to be $0 annually.

20-Year Total Cost Projection

The total estimated 20-year cost for the healthy male is calculated as follows:

  • Total for the first 2 years: $27,657 per year * 2 years = $55,314

  • Total for the remaining 18 years: $24,657 per year * 18 years = $443,826

  • Total Estimated 20-Year Cost: $55,314 + $443,826 = $499,140.

The personal trainer cost, while significant for the initial period, represents a short-term, targeted investment. This front-loads some of the expenses for the healthy individual. However, the long-term benefits, such as sustained lower ongoing healthcare costs, improved health, and reduced mortality risk, accrue over the entire 20-year period. This demonstrates that strategic, upfront investments in establishing healthy habits can lead to disproportionately larger savings and benefits over time. This highlights that preventative health is not just about ongoing costs but also about strategic, time-limited investments that yield compounding returns. Initial intensive support for lifestyle change can be a highly cost-effective strategy.

Associated Mortality Risk and Life Expectancy Impact

A normal weight, metabolically healthy male serves as the baseline or reference group (Relative Risk (RR) = 1.00) for all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality.[18] This inherently implies the lowest baseline risk within the context of this comparison. The average life expectancy for males in the US is approximately 77 years.[21] A healthy lifestyle aims not only to reach but potentially exceed this average, free from the significant reductions in lifespan associated with chronic diseases like diabetes and obesity.

A crucial finding from the literature is that "After the inclusion of CRF [cardiorespiratory fitness] in the model, the risks associated with obesity and MetS were no longer significant".[18] This suggests that while obesity and metabolic syndrome without good fitness are highly detrimental, achieving and maintaining high cardiorespiratory fitness can substantially mitigate these risks. The healthy male scenario, with consistent gym membership and initial personal training, directly contributes to higher CRF. This finding provides a powerful argument for promoting physical activity and fitness, even for individuals who may struggle with weight loss. It suggests that improving fitness can be a primary protective factor against the adverse health outcomes of metabolic syndrome, highlighting a key mechanism through which the healthy lifestyle yields benefits.

5. Comparative Financial Analysis

20-Year Total Cost Comparison

A direct comparison of the total projected costs for both scenarios over the 20-year analysis period reveals a significant financial disparity.

Table 3: 20-Year Cost Comparison: Metabolic Syndrome vs. Healthy Lifestyle

This table offers a clear, concise visual representation of the financial disparity between the two lifestyle paths, allowing for rapid comprehension of the overall cost differences. By presenting the total 20-year figures, it quantifies the direct financial "return" on investment in a healthy lifestyle, making the economic benefits tangible. The breakdown by category highlights where the majority of expenses lie in each scenario (e.g., medical costs for the metabolic syndrome individual versus lifestyle investments for the healthy individual), informing targeted interventions or personal budgeting. For individuals, employers, or policymakers, this table serves as concrete evidence to support decisions favoring preventative health measures over reactive disease management.

Discussion of Cost Drivers and Significant Differences

The analysis clearly shows that the overwhelming majority of the higher costs in the metabolic syndrome scenario stem from medical expenses. This includes ongoing doctor visits, specialist consultations, diagnostic tests, and a myriad of prescription medications required to manage diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, along with potential complications. These costs are exacerbated by the "beyond additive" effect of multimorbidity.[1] Health insurance premiums also contribute significantly to this disparity, as insurers factor in the increased risk associated with chronic conditions, leading to surcharges for individuals with metabolic syndrome.[12]

In contrast, the healthy male's higher initial costs are predominantly driven by proactive investments in quality food and fitness activities, particularly the short-term personal trainer fees. These are largely fixed or preventative expenditures designed to maintain health rather than treat illness.

At first glance, a "typical American diet" might appear cheaper than "quality foods." However, studies indicate that unhealthy diets result in $50 billion in additional healthcare costs every year.[24] This reveals that the perceived savings on unhealthy food are an illusion, as they are indirectly compensated by significantly higher downstream medical expenses. The true cost of an unhealthy lifestyle is hidden in future medical bills. This challenges the common misconception that healthy living is inherently more expensive. It reframes the discussion from a simple comparison of grocery bills to a comprehensive assessment of total lifetime costs, including healthcare, thereby strengthening the economic argument for preventative health.

Analysis of the Return on Investment (ROI) for Healthy Lifestyle Expenditures

The direct financial ROI is evident in the substantial difference in total 20-year costs between the two scenarios. The "investment" in quality food, gym membership, and personal training for the healthy male translates into significant "savings" compared to the expenditures incurred by the metabolic syndrome male.

This ROI extends beyond direct financial figures to encompass indirect costs. Metabolic syndrome, obesity, and diabetes are significant contributors to lost productivity at work (presenteeism, estimated at $35.8 billion annually) and unemployment due to chronic disability ($28.3 billion annually).[4] While not directly quantified in the individual cost comparison, these represent substantial broader societal and personal economic benefits of maintaining good health. Preventative health measures mitigate these indirect costs, enhancing overall economic output and individual earning potential.

6. Mortality Risk and Broader Health Outcomes

Comparative Mortality Risk and Life Expectancy

The health outcomes, particularly mortality risk and life expectancy, present a critical dimension of this cost-benefit analysis, revealing the profound human cost of metabolic syndrome versus the invaluable benefits of a healthy lifestyle.

Table 4: Comparative Mortality Risk and Life Expectancy

This table provides a stark and direct quantification of the most severe health outcome – premature mortality – for each scenario. It moves beyond financial figures to highlight the human cost. While financial savings are important, this table underscores that the most profound benefit of a healthy lifestyle is the preservation of life and health, which is an invaluable and often unquantifiable return. It serves as a powerful tool for individuals to understand the direct and severe health implications of their lifestyle choices, potentially motivating behavioral change. For public health campaigns, this table provides compelling evidence to highlight the severe consequences of chronic diseases and the life-saving potential of preventative measures.

Discussion of the Qualitative Benefits of a Healthy Lifestyle

Beyond merely extending life, a healthy lifestyle profoundly enhances the quality of life. This includes higher energy levels, improved physical function and mobility, reduced chronic pain, better sleep, and enhanced mental well-being, contrasting with the psychological effects sometimes associated with obesity.[19] This translates to a more active, fulfilling, and independent life, free from the daily burdens, discomfort, and limitations associated with managing chronic conditions and their complications.

Metabolic syndrome significantly increases the risk of developing severe and debilitating complications, such as heart attacks, strokes, kidney disease (diabetic nephropathy), eye disease (diabetic retinopathy), and nerve damage (neuropathy).[1] A healthy lifestyle drastically reduces the likelihood of these events, preventing long-term disability and the associated physical and emotional toll.

Furthermore, obesity and metabolic syndrome are major contributors to lost productivity at work, including "presenteeism" (reduced productivity while at work, accounting for $35.8 billion annually) and unemployment due to chronic disability ($28.3 billion annually).[4] The healthy individual is more likely to maintain consistent employment, higher levels of productivity, and overall economic contribution, benefiting both personal financial stability and the broader economy.

A comprehensive cost-benefit analysis must integrate these qualitative and indirect benefits. The true value of a healthy lifestyle is not solely in avoiding medical bills but in gaining years of healthy, productive, and fulfilling life, which represents an invaluable and often overlooked return on investment.

7. Cost-Benefit Synthesis and Discussion

Integration of Financial and Health Outcomes

The data presented in this analysis unequivocally demonstrates that while adopting and maintaining a healthy lifestyle requires deliberate upfront and ongoing investment, the long-term financial savings realized from avoiding the complications of metabolic syndrome are substantial. Over 20 years, the healthy male scenario is projected to cost approximately $266,100 less than the metabolic syndrome male. More critically, the profound reduction in mortality risk and the preservation of life expectancy represent an invaluable benefit that far outweighs the direct lifestyle costs. The healthy male scenario emerges as the clear winner in both economic viability and human well-being.

Highlighting the Long-Term Value Proposition of Preventative Health Investments

This analysis serves as a compelling and data-driven argument for prioritizing preventative health measures. The initial and consistent investment in quality nutrition, regular exercise, and even professional fitness guidance acts as a powerful long-term insurance policy. This proactive approach safeguards against the exponentially higher future medical costs, the burden of chronic disease management, and a significantly reduced lifespan that characterize the metabolic syndrome scenario. It reframes health spending from a reactive expense to a strategic, high-yield investment.

Addressing Societal and Individual Implications

From an individual perspective, the analysis illuminates a stark choice: a path that leads to escalating medical debt, diminished quality of life, and premature mortality, versus a path of sustained investment in well-being that pays significant dividends in both financial health and longevity. It empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their health and finances.

From a broader public health and economic standpoint, these findings underscore the robust economic rationale for policies that actively promote healthy eating habits, encourage physical activity, and support preventative healthcare access. The consistent financial and mortality data clearly establishes a strong causal link between individual health status and broader economic outcomes. The current system often focuses on treating illness, which is shown to be far more expensive and less effective in preserving life and quality of life. This suggests that a significant portion of healthcare spending is reactive rather than proactive. Investing in community wellness programs, incentivizing the production and accessibility of healthy foods, and integrating preventative care into healthcare systems could yield immense returns in terms of reduced national healthcare expenditures, a more productive workforce, and a healthier, more resilient population. This analysis provides a powerful economic argument for a fundamental paradigm shift in healthcare funding and policy. It advocates for greater investment in primary prevention, public health education, and health promotion initiatives. Such a shift would not only improve individual health outcomes but also lead to substantial long-term savings for healthcare systems, employers, and national economies, fostering a more productive and vibrant society.

8. Conclusion and Recommendations

Summary of Overall Cost-Benefit Findings

The 20-year cost-benefit analysis unequivocally demonstrates the overwhelming advantage of a proactive healthy lifestyle over living with metabolic syndrome. Despite the direct annual costs associated with quality food, gym memberships, and personal training, the healthy male scenario is projected to save hundreds of thousands of dollars over two decades compared to the metabolic syndrome male. Crucially, this financial benefit is coupled with a dramatically reduced risk of premature mortality and a preserved life expectancy, alongside significant improvements in overall quality of life and productivity.

Recommendations for Individuals

  • Prioritize Preventative Health as an Investment: Individuals should view expenditures on quality foods, regular exercise, and professional fitness guidance not as discretionary spending, but as essential long-term investments in their personal financial stability, health, and longevity.

  • Embrace Early Intervention: For those at risk or already showing early signs of metabolic syndrome (e.g., pre-diabetes, borderline hypertension/cholesterol), aggressive and sustained lifestyle changes can potentially reverse or halt disease progression, thereby avoiding the escalating costs and severe health risks associated with full-blown chronic conditions.

  • Seek Professional Guidance: Consulting with healthcare professionals, registered dietitians, and certified personal trainers for personalized advice and support tailored to individual health needs and goals can optimize the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions.

Recommendations for Broader Health Initiatives

  • Implement Policy Support for Healthy Lifestyles: Governments and policymakers should develop and implement policies that make healthy food more affordable and accessible (e.g., subsidies for fresh produce, taxes on unhealthy foods), and that actively promote physical activity within communities (e.g., safe walking/biking paths, accessible public recreational facilities).

  • Invest in Employer Wellness Programs: Employers should be encouraged to significantly invest in comprehensive employee wellness programs. These programs, which support healthy eating, physical activity, and stress management, have a proven return on investment through reduced employee healthcare costs, decreased absenteeism, and increased productivity.

  • Strengthen Public Health Education: Continuous and targeted public health education campaigns are vital to raise awareness about the long-term financial and health consequences of metabolic syndrome and to highlight the profound, multi-faceted benefits of preventative lifestyle choices. These campaigns should emphasize the economic value of health.

The report's findings clearly illustrate that individual health outcomes have direct and substantial economic impacts on society as a whole (e.g., through healthcare costs, lost productivity). Therefore, societal investment in preventative health is not merely a welfare measure but a strategic economic imperative. This analysis provides a robust framework for advocating for a national health strategy that prioritizes prevention and wellness. Such a strategy would lead to a healthier population, reduced strain on healthcare systems, and a more robust and productive economy, yielding a significant societal dividend.

Works cited

  1. Annual Medical Costs for Patients with and without Each Metabolic ..., accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Annual-Medical-Costs-for-Patients-with-and-without-Each-Metabolic-Syndrome-Component-by_tbl2_49691361

  2. Cardiometabolic disease costs associated with suboptimal diet in the United States: A cost analysis based on a microsimulation model | PLOS Medicine, accessed July 15, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002981

  3. Prevalence of obesity-related multimorbidity and its health care costs among adults in the United States | Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.jmcp.org/doi/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.2.179

  4. New American Diabetes Association Report Finds Annual Costs of Diabetes to be $412.9 Billion, accessed July 15, 2025, https://diabetes.org/newsroom/press-releases/new-american-diabetes-association-report-finds-annual-costs-diabetes-be

  5. Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2022 - PubMed, accessed July 15, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37909353/

  6. Health and Economic Benefits of High Blood Pressure Interventions - CDC, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/priorities/high-blood-pressure.html

  7. Trends in Healthcare Expenditures Among US Adults With Hypertension: National Estimates, 2003–2014 | Journal of the American Heart Association, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/jaha.118.008731

  8. Cost Effectiveness of Statin Therapy for the Primary Prevention of Major Coronary Events in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes, accessed July 15, 2025, https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/26/6/1796/26388/Cost-Effectiveness-of-Statin-Therapy-for-the

  9. Trends in direct health care costs among US adults with ..., accessed July 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11232126/

  10. How Much Does Health Insurance Cost In The USA? - William Russell, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.william-russell.com/blog/health-insurance-usa-cost/

  11. Section 1: Cost of Health Insurance - 10480 - KFF, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.kff.org/report-section/ehbs-2024-section-1-cost-of-health-insurance/

  12. How Obesity Impacts Your Health Insurance Premium - Policybazaar, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.policybazaar.com/health-insurance/individual-health-insurance/articles/how-weight-affects-health-insurance-premium/

  13. Health Insurance and Diabetes - NCBI, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK597725/

  14. The Average Cost of Food in the US - Move.org, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.move.org/the-average-cost-of-food-in-the-us/

  15. The High Cost of Healthy: How Grocery Prices Shape American Diets and Health, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.ajmc.com/view/the-high-cost-of-healthy-how-grocery-prices-shape-american-diets-and-health

  16. The Medical Minute: Vitamin supplements versus a balanced diet? No contest - Penn State Health News, accessed July 15, 2025, https://pennstatehealthnews.org/2024/03/the-medical-minute-vitamin-supplements-versus-a-balanced-diet-no-contest/

  17. US Nutritional Supplements Market Analysis Report 2022 to 2030 - Insights10, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.insights10.com/report/us-nutritional-supplements-market-analysis/

  18. Metabolic Syndrome, Obesity, and Mortality | Diabetes Care, accessed July 15, 2025, https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/28/2/391/24045/Metabolic-Syndrome-Obesity-and-MortalityImpact-of

  19. The Impact of Obesity on Life Expectancy - SAMA Bariatrics, accessed July 15, 2025, https://samabariatrics.com/the-impact-of-obesity-on-life-expectancy/

  20. Obesity - NHS, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/obesity/

  21. Diabetes Life Expectancy - Type 1 and Type 2 Life Expectancy, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.diabetes.co.uk/diabetes-life-expectancy.html

  22. BMI and all cause mortality: systematic review and non-linear dose-response meta-analysis of 230 cohort studies with 3.74 - The BMJ, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/353/bmj.i2156.full.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3UziUstPADj5tnIc46ctLJ4K_Uo8Kj6eMDxiWUyatIG3gHihoN7kypBHc

  23. Health Care Costs Steadily Increase With Body Mass, accessed July 15, 2025, https://globalhealth.duke.edu/news/health-care-costs-steadily-increase-body-mass-0

  24. How Much More Expensive is Healthy Food in Every State - online doctor at PlushCare, accessed July 15, 2025, https://plushcare.com/blog/how-much-more-expensive-healthy-food-every-state

  25. How Much is a Gym Membership In 2024? - ReliaBills, accessed July 15, 2025, https://www.reliabills.com/blog/how-much-is-a-gym-membership/

  26. How Much Do Gym Memberships Cost in 2024? - WodGuru, accessed July 15, 2025, https://wod.guru/blog/average-gym-membership-cost/